Friday, September 20, 2013

A "Discovery of Competence" Course - Blog 2


Sketch out a 3-week unit for a Kutz, Groden, and Zamel course that meets 3 time a week for 50 minutes per meeting. You'll want to include pre-reading activities, reading assignments, post-reading activities, brainstorming, drafting, revising, and editing/polishing.

•   day 1: Class welcome – present syllabus. Then, as an introduction to the course and to each other, think of a story you tell often to friends or family. No need to write yet. Get the idea of the story firmly in your head and come prepared to tell your story to the class on Wednesday. Volunteers tell a few stories as time permits at the end of class. 
•   day 2: Finish telling stories. Then ask students how they came up with which story they wanted to tell. Was it easy or hard to get an idea? Did they change their mind at any point about what to tell? What kinds of stories did we hear from the class and what was the intent of the telling (what did we learn about each other)? Following class discussion, give time to write down the story you told. HW: Finish writing the story and bring a draft to class.
•   day 3: Discuss how written stories might be a bit different than the oral versions (you’re using paragraphs now, for one thing). Lesson on paragraph structure and development. What is the purpose of paragraphs and how do they help the reader? Peer review of draft stories. HW: Revise story. Reading about oral storytelling, ask students to underline/highlight some parts they find interesting.
•   day 4: Collect stories. Discuss the reading and the act of annotating. What did you highlight and why? What other kind of markings might be useful to you as you read?
•   day 5: Put students into reading groups based on similarities I’ve found in their stories. As a group, read each other’s stories and talk about when you usually tell the story and how it was different telling it in front of the class compared to its usual context, how it is different written than they way you usually tell it? Come to some group conclusions about oral vs written texts. What are their functions? Present your group hypotheses to the class. Write ideas on board.  HW: Give students 3 circles. In Circle 1:  key points in your oral story, reflections on the story   Circle 2:  favorite lines in your written story, reflections  Circle 3:  note similarities and differences in language and context
•   day 6: Share your circles with your group. Jot down any new ideas that you’ve gotten from seeing what your groupmates wrote. Lesson on essay organization, transitions, etc. Brainstorm ways to organize your ideas.  Give essay prompt.
•   day 7: Bring draft of First Essay to class for Peer Review. Peer review with your group AND with someone not from your group (are your ideas clear to someone not in your discourse community?).  HW:  Revise paper.
•   day 8: Bring revised paper to class. Brief lesson on grammar/editing based on sentence-level errors seen in earlier drafts. Brainstorm different discourse communities students are a part of in preparation for next unit (ethnographic research on transactional/poetic discourse). Reading/example from Fieldwork textbook. Ask students to draw hypotheses about language use in different communities—write ideas on board. HW: choose a community to work with for next unit.
•   day 9: Turn in final draft of 4-page paper. Pre-writing about their discourse community. Assign daily discourse log for their fieldwork. 

5 comments:

  1. This is a very straight-forward looking, well-thought out curriculum, which I'll be interested to get more details in discussion about, especially the '3 circles' reflection exercise which seems like it would also be a good in-class, group reflection process on the board...About the unit itself (and you are teaching these courses so you know better than I), it seems that the essay assignment is rushed in Day 6 and Day7, where I think Zamel et al would emphasize a longer process with multiple drafts. Is the essay related to the oral narrative? These seem like they could be two complete units in themselves that could be extended into the whole nine day curriculum in ways that emphasize students' conscious reflection on process...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can see how just seeing "Assign Essay" and "Revise Essay" looks like I've thrown an assignment at them on Day 6, but everything the students have been working on Day 1 - 5 is pre-writing for the essay. The essay will create a thesis about how oral and written texts differ, with their own oral narrative (now written down) as support. By the time I hand them the assignment, they have a lot of the essay written, they just don't know it yet. Day 6, then, is all about organizing the ideas they've already fleshed out into an "essay." Depending on the level of writing turned in on Day 7, Day 8 may need to be a working day, with students revising in class and me conferencing. If that's not necessary, then I'd want to begin setting up the next unit.

      Delete
  2. I really liked that each class built on the last one. I also liked that you didn't start them off with writing. You had them tell stories and build a comfortable community. This is really straight forward and simple. I think your students could follow your plan day by day and not feel that your standard was too complicated. I think it was really realistic and you could fit it all into a fifty minute class period.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This looks like a solid unit. Each class seems to flow into/from the next. I like how you've broken down discourse communities from the overall classroom to peer groups, themselves. It's also a great idea to divide students into groups based on themes/threads you find in their writing. It would be interesting to see the outcomes of this intentional approach to grouping students. I also like that students change groups after one unit is complete.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This looks like a solid unit. Each class seems to flow into/from the next. I like how you've broken down discourse communities from the overall classroom to peer groups, themselves. It's also a great idea to divide students into groups based on themes/threads you find in their writing. It would be interesting to see the outcomes of this intentional approach to grouping students. I also like that students change groups after one unit is complete.

    ReplyDelete